TAKE ACTION

Action Center

The CFTC's own investigator admitted she never reviewed the blockchain. Every investor made money. Chairman Selig promised to end regulation by enforcement — 8 times. Here is how you can hold them accountable.

$209M
Judgment with zero investor losses
100%
Investors opposed CFTC actions
8
Times Selig promised to end enforcement-first

Email Congress & the CFTC

Choose a template, then click any contact to open a pre-filled email in your mail client. Personalize the opening line with your name and state before sending.

Email Preview
Subject: Urgent: CFTC v. Ikkurty (No. 1:22-cv-02465 / 7th Cir. No. 24-2684) — Request for Oversight Review
Dear [Senator/Representative Name], I am writing to request your urgent attention to CFTC v. Sam Ikkurty (Case No. 1:22-cv-02465), currently on appeal at the 7th Circuit (No. 24-2684). This case raises serious concerns about the CFTC's enforcement practices that directly contradict Chairman Michael Selig's repeated public pledges to end "regulation by enforcement." KEY FACTS: 1. CFTC lead investigator Heather Dasso admitted under oath: "I did not look at the blockchain." — in a case built entirely on DeFi blockchain transactions. 2. Every single investor made money: 69 investors collectively invested $5 million and received $30 million back — a 303% CAGR. Zero investor losses. 3. 100% of investors (32 formal objections, Dkt. 204–243) filed court documents opposing the CFTC's actions. 4. The CFTC is pursuing a $209 million judgment — calculated without reviewing the blockchain record that shows the actual fund activity. 5. Chairman Selig has publicly stated on at least 8 separate occasions (January–April 2026) that "regulation by enforcement is dead" — yet this case remains active under his leadership. The full public record, including all 53 court documents, 885 blockchain transactions, and point-by-point rebuttals to every CFTC claim, is available at: https://samikkurty.com I respectfully request that your office: - Request a briefing from the CFTC on the current status of this case - Ask Chairman Selig to explain how this case is consistent with his stated policy of ending regulation by enforcement - Consider whether congressional oversight of this matter is warranted Thank you for your time and attention to this matter. Respectfully, [Your Name] [Your State]

Senate Contacts

Sen. John Boozman
CFTC Oversight — Primary
The Senate Agriculture Committee has direct oversight over the CFTC. Chairman Boozman can call hearings and demand accountability.
Email Boozman
Sen. Debbie Stabenow
CFTC Oversight — Minority
Ranking member with equal standing to request CFTC briefings and case reviews.
Email Stabenow
Sen. Cynthia Lummis
Pro-Crypto Advocate
Co-author of the LUMMIS-GILLIBRAND Responsible Financial Innovation Act. Vocal critic of CFTC overreach.
Email Lummis
Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand
Pro-Crypto Advocate
Co-author of the LUMMIS-GILLIBRAND Act. Has publicly called for clear crypto regulation, not enforcement-first policy.
Email Gillibrand

House Contacts

Rep. Glenn Thompson
CFTC Oversight — House
House Agriculture Committee oversees the CFTC. Chairman Thompson can call oversight hearings.
Email Thompson
Rep. Tom Emmer
Pro-Crypto Advocate
Introduced the Securities Clarity Act. Consistent critic of SEC and CFTC overreach in crypto markets.
Email Emmer

Share on Social Media

Copy any of these pre-written posts and share them on X (Twitter), LinkedIn, or any platform. Each one is under 280 characters and links directly to the evidence.

Blockchain Evidence

The CFTC's own investigator admitted under oath: "I did not look at the blockchain." This is a DeFi case. The blockchain IS the evidence. Full record: https://samikkurty.com/blockchain-evidence @TheBlock__ @DannyNelson @DecryptMedia @CoinDesk

Broken Promise

@ChairmanSelig said "regulation by enforcement is dead" — 8 times since January 2026. CFTC v. Ikkurty is still active. $209M judgment. Zero investor losses. 100% investor support. The documented contradiction: https://samikkurty.com/selig-broken-promise

Investor Support

69 investors. $5M in. $30M out. 303% CAGR. Zero losses. Every single investor filed court documents opposing the CFTC. Yet the $209M judgment stands. Full investor record: https://samikkurty.com/legal-documents @Cointelegraph @prestonpysh @RepGTThompson

Share the Evidence

The most powerful thing you can do is share the primary source pages directly. These pages contain the actual court documents, blockchain records, and sworn testimony — not summaries.

Note: This page is provided for advocacy and public information purposes only. Nothing on this site constitutes legal advice. All facts stated are sourced from publicly available court records, blockchain data, and official CFTC statements. Email templates are suggestions — please personalize before sending.